Virginia Motor Sport Club Discussion Forums
October 20, 2017, 01:58:19 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News:
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: 2016 PAX/RTP  (Read 8273 times)
jamescarriv
VMSC Board
Full Member
*********
Offline Offline

Posts: 158



View Profile
« on: November 19, 2015, 07:45:18 AM »

2016 Autocross year PAX is posted.

http://solotime.info/pax/rtp2016.html

Looks like ST classes have the biggest changes.
Logged

James

Youtube

2007 Honda Civic Si (HS)
2013 Honda Fit Sport
allmybase
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 54


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: November 19, 2015, 01:04:14 PM »

STX, now <sarcasm>officially</sarcasm> faster then SS.
Logged

Joseph Banks
26 STX 06 RX8
gunny
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 706



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: November 22, 2015, 06:43:21 AM »

2016 Autocross year PAX is posted.

http://solotime.info/pax/rtp2016.html

Looks like ST classes have the biggest changes.

James
you should update the pax file on the computer. Send it over to me and I'll check it.
Maybe work on real time timing too.
Let me know

Gunny
Logged
Shane Irving
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 145



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: November 22, 2015, 03:11:19 PM »

I'm glad they changed the STP already first day they had a .847 almost thought I was making a bad decision moving to ST but with a .837 I'll except that challenge 
Logged
allmybase
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 54


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: November 22, 2015, 04:45:59 PM »

IDK what was going on with the first STP number.  Seems really optimistic for STP to be faster then STU even with wider tires and have a pax harder them CAM.
Logged

Joseph Banks
26 STX 06 RX8
rothaus
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 669



View Profile WWW
« Reply #5 on: November 22, 2015, 04:47:26 PM »

I should be able to run in ST, right ?

In STP, P = Porsche ??

Cheers
Engelbert
Logged

Engelbert's Garage | My Porsche Video | The AIRBOXER Garage Build
2006 Cayenne S Work Horse
2006 Boxster the Puppy
1988 944 Turbo
1986 944 the beater
1982 911 SC
1978 VW Super Beetle Cabrio LTP
1976 914 in the works
1971 911T AX Car
1970 911T Current Project
Shane Irving
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 145



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: November 26, 2015, 05:08:52 AM »

Yea I dont know what he was thinking with the first pax, the tire limit is going to help the most hopefully I can save enough for 18x11s and 315s and ditch these 265s.

Porsche doesn't have a legal ST class do they?
Logged
sjfehr
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 26



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: January 17, 2016, 04:10:26 PM »

Yea I dont know what he was thinking with the first pax, the tire limit is going to help the most hopefully I can save enough for 18x11s and 315s and ditch these 265s.

Porsche doesn't have a legal ST class do they?
There are a few older Porsches classed, but no water cooled (yet).  The STU rules were modified this year to include mid-engine and rear-engine and we're expecting to see at least 986 classed in STU; how much else is speculation right now.  It will probably be fairly conservative this year, with performance impacting what cars get classed in STU next year. 

2015 STU tire allowances are pretty restrictive for mid & rear-engine, though.  My opinion is that with the heavy RWD moving to STP, this year is a great opportunity to drastically increase the tire allowances across all of STU to let people run the tires they actually WANT to instead of artificially narrow tires.  I think the best way to fix this is to change the wording from absolute tire width to average width.  That you could run 255 square on a Boxster, or you could run OEM sizes of 235 front 265 rear on a 987 Cayman, etc.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Copyright © 2017 Virginia Motor Sport Club
Website developed & hosted by Autocross.US